Assessment sheet for Baltic Sea region and for six subdivisions
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
| Indicators | 0 to 200 m | 200 to 800 m | more than 800 m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average intensity (I-1) | 0.31 | 0 | NA |
| Proportion of area in fished cells (I-2) | 0.27 | 0 | NA |
| Proportion of area fished per year (I-3) | 0.12 | 0 | NA |
| Smallest prop. of area in fished cells with 90% of fishing effort (I-4) | 0.08 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area in unfished cells (I-5) | 0.73 | 1 | NA |
| Average PD impact (I-6) | 0.01 | 0 | NA |
| Average L1 impact (I-6) | 0.12 | 0 | NA |
| Proportion of area with PD impact < 0.2 (I-7) | 1.00 | 1 | NA |
| Proportion of area with L1 impact < 0.2 (I-7) | 0.85 | 1 | NA |
Figure 1 Geographic distribution of surface abrasion, seabed sensitivity (community longevity) and total value and weight from mobile bottom-contacting gear. The maps of surface abrasion, value and weight show the average per year for 2013-2018
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
Figure 2 Surface abrasion, Swept Area Ratio, by mobile bottom-contacting gears (year-1), averaged for the 2013-2018 six-year cycle
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat (1000 km2) | Number of grid cells | Landings 1000 tonnes | Value 106 euro | Swept area 1000 km2 | Average intensity (I-1) | Prop. of area in fished grid cells (I-2) | Prop. of area fished per year (I-3) | Smallest prop. of area with 90% of fishing effort (I-4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 21.16 | 2533 | 14.80 | 11.99 | 34.29 | 1.62 | 0.61 | 0.51 | 0.22 |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 19.52 | 2978 | 7.37 | 6.91 | 21.03 | 1.08 | 0.43 | 0.27 | 0.10 |
| Circalittoral sand | 33.07 | 6575 | 6.31 | 5.41 | 16.00 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.22 | 0.08 |
| Infralittoral sand | 24.10 | 3888 | 3.33 | 3.08 | 11.02 | 0.46 | 0.55 | 0.22 | 0.10 |
| Circalittoral mud | 22.81 | 5812 | 5.24 | 4.90 | 10.86 | 0.48 | 0.28 | 0.19 | 0.05 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 106.88 | 13585 | 5.52 | 3.16 | 5.95 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 2.74 | 777 | 1.84 | 1.63 | 4.89 | 1.78 | 0.75 | 0.52 | 0.21 |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 53.90 | 7756 | 3.76 | 2.23 | 4.45 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.03 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 33.81 | 3095 | 1.23 | 0.97 | 2.76 | 0.08 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 18.77 | 5590 | 0.48 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Infralittoral mud | 1.83 | 1235 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.69 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.17 | 0.05 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 6.95 | 2449 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.51 | 0.07 | 0.28 | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 12.21 | 4679 | 0.41 | 0.23 | 0.50 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 6.84 | 3334 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 3.94 | 2303 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 3.88 | 1497 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.72 | 536 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.18 | 238 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Unknown | 0.17 | 100 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA |
Figure 3. Time series of (a) mean fishing intensity (surface abrasion), (b) proportion of the surface area of the seafloor fished, (c) aggregation of fishing (proportion of the surface area with 90% of the fishing effort) by habitat. Results represent vessels over 15m (2009-2011) and vessels over 12m (2012-2018).
Figure 4. Cumulative proportion of the swept area, landings and value. Grid cells were sorted from highest to lowest fishing intensity and include non-fished cells. The results are for all mobile bottom-contacting gears based on averaged fishing data per c-square from 2013-2018.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Figure 5. Number of years c-squares are within the 90% core fishing grounds by metier during the period 2013-2018
Figure 6. Percentage area overlap between the 90% highest value per year and the reference core fishing ground
Figure 7. Percent area fished vs. landings value (euro) by métier, coloured by year
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
| DRB_MOL | OT_CRU | OT_DMF | OT_MI | OT_SPF | SDN_DMF | SSC_DMF | TBB_CRU | TBB_DMF | TBB_MOL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area swept (1000 km2) | <0.005 | <0.005 | 105.75 | 0 | 3.25 | 5.09 | 0.02 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Landings (1000 tonnes) | 0.05 | 0.01 | 41.49 | 0 | 9.24 | 0.40 | <0.005 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Value (10^6 euro) | <0.005 | <0.005 | 39.10 | 0 | 2.84 | 0.57 | <0.005 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/Area swept (1000 km2) | 2142.54 | 3.61 | 0.39 | NaN | 2.84 | 0.08 | 0.05 | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Value (10^6 euro)/Area swept (1000 km2) | 85.7 | 1.48 | 0.37 | NaN | 0.87 | 0.11 | 0.08 | NaN | NaN | NaN |
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
Figure 8. Impact of mobile bottom-contacting gears averaged for the 2013-2018 six-year cycle for the PD and L1 method.
Figure 9. The mean impact of mobile bottom-contacting gears in all combined MSFD habitats and the four most extensive habitat types between 2009 and 2018 (left). The proportion of the fished area with an impact of less than 0.2 (right)
| DRB_MOL | OT_CRU | OT_DMF | OT_MI | OT_SPF | SDN_DMF | SSC_DMF | TBB_CRU | TBB_DMF | TBB_MOL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/PD impact | 34.438 | 0.437 | 0.338 | NA | 3.555 | 0.151 | 0.052 | NA | NA | NA |
| Value (10^6 euro)/PD impact | 1.378 | 0.179 | 0.318 | NA | 1.092 | 0.215 | 0.081 | NA | NA | NA |
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/L1 impact | 39.745 | 0.525 | 0.018 | NA | 0.055 | 0.005 | 0.001 | NA | NA | NA |
| Value (10^6 euro)/L1 impact | 1.590 | 0.215 | 0.017 | NA | 0.017 | 0.007 | 0.001 | NA | NA | NA |
Figure 10. PD impact (upper panel) and L1 impact (lower panel) of selected gear groupings on the most extensive MSFD habitat types. Impact is estimated in isolation of the other gear groupings. Note the different scales on the Y-axis.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.03 | 0.47 | 38.61 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0.03 | 0.40 | 54.69 | 94.51 | 94.34 |
| 10 | 0.03 | 0.35 | 61.78 | 88.77 | 88.93 |
| 15 | 0.03 | 0.30 | 67.46 | 82.76 | 83.54 |
| 20 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 71.50 | 77.16 | 78.38 |
| 30 | 0.02 | 0.21 | 77.97 | 65.96 | 68.21 |
| 40 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 82.92 | 56.00 | 59.06 |
| 60 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 90.36 | 36.96 | 38.66 |
| 80 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 96.09 | 18.53 | 18.44 |
| 99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 99.93 | 1.26 | 1.17 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 57.33 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 76.34 | 94.66 | 92.97 |
| 10 | 0.02 | 0.19 | 80.54 | 89.96 | 87.95 |
| 15 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 83.28 | 85.09 | 82.62 |
| 20 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 85.58 | 80.01 | 77.63 |
| 30 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 88.90 | 70.24 | 67.69 |
| 40 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 91.66 | 60.37 | 57.68 |
| 60 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 95.95 | 40.68 | 39.09 |
| 80 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 98.77 | 21.04 | 21.08 |
| 99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 1.91 | 2.01 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 54.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0.01 | 0.19 | 75.57 | 93.86 | 93.66 |
| 10 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 80.54 | 87.80 | 87.49 |
| 15 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 84.06 | 83.11 | 82.32 |
| 20 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 86.30 | 77.21 | 76.26 |
| 30 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 90.16 | 66.99 | 63.74 |
| 40 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 92.88 | 57.12 | 53.93 |
| 60 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 96.24 | 38.72 | 33.75 |
| 80 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 98.76 | 20.27 | 16.17 |
| 99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 2.02 | 1.78 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 44.53 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0.01 | 0.19 | 71.89 | 88.74 | 87.45 |
| 10 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 78.52 | 80.13 | 80.41 |
| 15 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 83.25 | 72.94 | 72.68 |
| 20 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 86.35 | 66.36 | 66.86 |
| 30 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 90.34 | 50.24 | 50.12 |
| 40 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 93.16 | 40.67 | 39.25 |
| 60 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 96.86 | 23.02 | 21.24 |
| 80 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 99.05 | 11.00 | 10.08 |
| 99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 2.98 | 1.73 |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 21.16 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 2.6 | 8.9 | 18.1 | 34.0 | 59.1 |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 19.52 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 1.3 | 9.1 | 33.9 |
| Circalittoral sand | 33.07 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 9.2 | 29.5 |
| Infralittoral sand | 24.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 4.0 | 11.5 | 29.1 |
| Circalittoral mud | 22.81 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 26.3 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 106.88 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 2.74 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 1.2 | 4.2 | 12.2 | 25.2 | 46.0 | 71.6 |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 53.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.8 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 33.81 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 6.2 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 18.77 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 |
| Infralittoral mud | 1.83 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 6.2 | 29.2 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 6.95 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 10.5 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 12.21 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.1 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 6.84 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 3.94 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 3.88 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.72 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.18 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Unknown | 0.17 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 21.16 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 3.0 | 10.1 | 20.8 | 38.2 | 62.2 |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 19.52 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 1.8 | 9.2 | 34.0 |
| Circalittoral sand | 33.07 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 11.3 | 32.4 |
| Infralittoral sand | 24.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 9.7 | 22.2 | 48.6 |
| Circalittoral mud | 22.81 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 3.3 | 29.4 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 106.88 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 2.74 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 5.3 | 14.6 | 27.3 | 47.1 | 71.4 |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 53.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.5 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 33.81 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 1.3 | 9.4 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 18.77 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.2 |
| Infralittoral mud | 1.83 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 6.7 | 32.9 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 6.95 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 2.4 | 14.8 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 12.21 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 6.6 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 6.84 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 3.94 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 3.88 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.72 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.9 |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.18 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Unknown | 0.17 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 21.16 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 3.2 | 10.0 | 19.8 | 35.6 | 60.4 |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 19.52 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 3.4 | 11.0 | 36.6 |
| Circalittoral sand | 33.07 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 0.5 | 2.9 | 11.6 | 35.2 |
| Infralittoral sand | 24.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 11.1 | 22.4 | 49.1 |
| Circalittoral mud | 22.81 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 6.0 | 32.8 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 106.88 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 2.74 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 5.7 | 13.9 | 25.7 | 46.7 | 70.8 |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 53.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.3 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 33.81 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 5.0 | 25.4 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 18.77 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 |
| Infralittoral mud | 1.83 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 7.9 | 34.6 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 6.95 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 2.2 | 13.6 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 12.21 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 5.9 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 6.84 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 3.94 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 3.88 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.72 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 20.5 |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.18 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Unknown | 0.17 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
| Indicators | 0 to 200 m | 200 to 800 m | more than 800 m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average intensity (I-1) | 0.01 | 0 | NA |
| Proportion of area in fished cells (I-2) | 0.06 | 0 | NA |
| Proportion of area fished per year (I-3) | 0.01 | 0 | NA |
| Smallest prop. of area in fished cells with 90% of fishing effort (I-4) | 0.01 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area in unfished cells (I-5) | 0.94 | 1 | NA |
| Average PD impact (I-6) | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Average L1 impact (I-6) | 0.01 | 0 | NA |
| Proportion of area with PD impact < 0.2 (I-7) | 1.00 | 1 | NA |
| Proportion of area with L1 impact < 0.2 (I-7) | 0.99 | 1 | NA |
Figure 1 Geographic distribution of surface abrasion, seabed sensitivity (community longevity) and total value and weight from mobile bottom-contacting gear. The maps of surface abrasion, value and weight show the average per year for 2013-2018
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
Figure 2 Surface abrasion, Swept Area Ratio, by mobile bottom-contacting gears (year-1), averaged for the 2013-2018 six-year cycle
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat (1000 km2) | Number of grid cells | Landings 1000 tonnes | Value 106 euro | Swept area 1000 km2 | Average intensity (I-1) | Prop. of area in fished grid cells (I-2) | Prop. of area fished per year (I-3) | Smallest prop. of area with 90% of fishing effort (I-4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 28.13 | 4021 | 1.56 | 1.27 | 0.59 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 56.01 | 6685 | 0.54 | 0.80 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 4.84 | 2076 | 0.11 | 0.43 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Circalittoral mud | 3.22 | 2103 | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Circalittoral sand | 7.34 | 2018 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 3.26 | 2005 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Infralittoral sand | 0.84 | 469 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 0.48 | 596 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 0.52 | 411 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 1.90 | 1348 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.10 | 278 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 1.31 | 940 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.01 | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.18 |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.07 | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.10 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 0.00 | 3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | NA |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.00 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.00 | 3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.00 | 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA |
Figure 3. Time series of (a) mean fishing intensity (surface abrasion), (b) proportion of the surface area of the seafloor fished, (c) aggregation of fishing (proportion of the surface area with 90% of the fishing effort) by habitat. Results represent vessels over 15m (2009-2011) and vessels over 12m (2012-2018).
Figure 4. Cumulative proportion of the swept area, landings and value. Grid cells were sorted from highest to lowest fishing intensity and include non-fished cells. The results are for all mobile bottom-contacting gears based on averaged fishing data per c-square from 2013-2018.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Figure 5. Number of years c-squares are within the 90% core fishing grounds by metier during the period 2013-2018
Figure 6. Percentage area overlap between the 90% highest value per year and the reference core fishing ground
Figure 7. Percent area fished vs. landings value (euro) by métier, coloured by year
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
| DRB_MOL | OT_CRU | OT_DMF | OT_MI | OT_SPF | SDN_DMF | SSC_DMF | TBB_CRU | TBB_DMF | TBB_MOL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area swept (1000 km2) | 0 | 0 | 0.46 | 0 | 0.65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Landings (1000 tonnes) | 0 | 0 | 0.67 | 0 | 1.92 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Value (10^6 euro) | 0 | 0 | 2.68 | 0 | 0.85 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/Area swept (1000 km2) | NaN | NaN | 1.45 | NaN | 2.95 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Value (10^6 euro)/Area swept (1000 km2) | NaN | NaN | 5.76 | NaN | 1.31 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
Figure 8. Impact of mobile bottom-contacting gears averaged for the 2013-2018 six-year cycle for the PD and L1 method.
Figure 9. The mean impact of mobile bottom-contacting gears in all combined MSFD habitats and the four most extensive habitat types between 2009 and 2018 (left). The proportion of the fished area with an impact of less than 0.2 (right)
| DRB_MOL | OT_CRU | OT_DMF | OT_MI | OT_SPF | SDN_DMF | SSC_DMF | TBB_CRU | TBB_DMF | TBB_MOL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/PD impact | NA | NA | 0.809 | NA | 3.340 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Value (10^6 euro)/PD impact | NA | NA | 3.219 | NA | 1.484 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/L1 impact | NA | NA | 0.021 | NA | 0.063 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Value (10^6 euro)/L1 impact | NA | NA | 0.082 | NA | 0.028 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Figure 10. PD impact (upper panel) and L1 impact (lower panel) of selected gear groupings on the most extensive MSFD habitat types. Impact is estimated in isolation of the other gear groupings. Note the different scales on the Y-axis.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 90.19 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0 | 0.01 | 96.11 | 94.88 | 94.64 |
| 10 | 0 | 0.01 | 97.25 | 88.87 | 89.70 |
| 15 | 0 | 0.01 | 97.90 | 81.91 | 85.02 |
| 20 | 0 | 0.01 | 98.26 | 75.95 | 81.37 |
| 30 | 0 | 0.01 | 98.78 | 60.05 | 72.20 |
| 40 | 0 | 0.01 | 99.15 | 51.86 | 63.87 |
| 60 | 0 | 0.00 | 99.55 | 29.75 | 43.70 |
| 80 | 0 | 0.00 | 99.81 | 18.91 | 23.75 |
| 99 | 0 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 3.46 | 6.07 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 95.20 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 97.80 | 97.93 | 94.73 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 98.68 | 93.60 | 87.42 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 99.11 | 90.79 | 82.66 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 99.27 | 86.20 | 78.64 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 99.49 | 72.53 | 69.67 |
| 40 | 0 | 0 | 99.63 | 64.92 | 61.25 |
| 60 | 0 | 0 | 99.83 | 42.15 | 40.21 |
| 80 | 0 | 0 | 99.93 | 21.44 | 22.57 |
| 99 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 8.37 | 2.88 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 96.33 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0 | 0.01 | 98.16 | 95.54 | 95.36 |
| 10 | 0 | 0.01 | 98.40 | 91.17 | 91.21 |
| 15 | 0 | 0.01 | 98.63 | 84.70 | 85.65 |
| 20 | 0 | 0.01 | 98.81 | 78.32 | 79.25 |
| 30 | 0 | 0.01 | 99.12 | 70.79 | 70.92 |
| 40 | 0 | 0.01 | 99.28 | 62.34 | 62.39 |
| 60 | 0 | 0.00 | 99.69 | 44.66 | 45.32 |
| 80 | 0 | 0.00 | 99.92 | 16.70 | 17.08 |
| 99 | 0 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 8.78 | 9.04 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 90.44 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0 | 0.01 | 95.41 | 97.49 | 94.42 |
| 10 | 0 | 0.01 | 96.61 | 95.18 | 88.87 |
| 15 | 0 | 0.01 | 97.47 | 93.69 | 84.21 |
| 20 | 0 | 0.01 | 97.83 | 91.27 | 79.86 |
| 30 | 0 | 0.01 | 98.18 | 85.76 | 67.05 |
| 40 | 0 | 0.01 | 99.01 | 81.48 | 57.02 |
| 60 | 0 | 0.00 | 99.60 | 60.00 | 37.26 |
| 80 | 0 | 0.00 | 99.84 | 44.52 | 15.70 |
| 99 | 0 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 9.38 | 3.82 |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 28.13 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 56.01 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 4.84 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral mud | 3.22 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral sand | 7.34 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 3.26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral sand | 0.84 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 0.48 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 0.52 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 1.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 1.31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.01 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 11.4 |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.07 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 28.13 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 56.01 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 4.84 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral mud | 3.22 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral sand | 7.34 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 3.26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral sand | 0.84 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 0.48 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 0.52 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 1.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 1.31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.01 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.4 |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.07 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 28.13 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 56.01 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 4.84 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral mud | 3.22 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral sand | 7.34 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 3.26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral sand | 0.84 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 0.48 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 0.52 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 1.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 1.31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.01 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.3 |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.07 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
| Indicators | 0 to 200 m | 200 to 800 m | more than 800 m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average intensity (I-1) | 0.00 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area in fished cells (I-2) | 0.01 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area fished per year (I-3) | 0.00 | NA | NA |
| Smallest prop. of area in fished cells with 90% of fishing effort (I-4) | 0.01 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area in unfished cells (I-5) | 0.99 | NA | NA |
| Average PD impact (I-6) | 0.00 | NA | NA |
| Average L1 impact (I-6) | 0.00 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area with PD impact < 0.2 (I-7) | 1.00 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area with L1 impact < 0.2 (I-7) | 1.00 | NA | NA |
Figure 1 Geographic distribution of surface abrasion, seabed sensitivity (community longevity) and total value and weight from mobile bottom-contacting gear. The maps of surface abrasion, value and weight show the average per year for 2013-2018
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
Figure 2 Surface abrasion, Swept Area Ratio, by mobile bottom-contacting gears (year-1), averaged for the 2013-2018 six-year cycle
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat (1000 km2) | Number of grid cells | Landings 1000 tonnes | Value 106 euro | Swept area 1000 km2 | Average intensity (I-1) | Prop. of area in fished grid cells (I-2) | Prop. of area fished per year (I-3) | Smallest prop. of area with 90% of fishing effort (I-4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circalittoral mud | 3.10 | 793 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | 0 | 0 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 5.99 | 1326 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.69 | 572 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 6.29 | 1166 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 0.93 | 792 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 1.10 | 815 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 1.26 | 559 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Circalittoral sand | 2.06 | 606 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 0.26 | 279 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.10 | 218 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 0.61 | 499 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Infralittoral sand | 0.73 | 368 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.13 | 71 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.88 | 271 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 3.06 | 370 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.90 | 182 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.06 | 71 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.36 | 118 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Unknown | 0.17 | 100 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
Figure 3. Time series of (a) mean fishing intensity (surface abrasion), (b) proportion of the surface area of the seafloor fished, (c) aggregation of fishing (proportion of the surface area with 90% of the fishing effort) by habitat. Results represent vessels over 15m (2009-2011) and vessels over 12m (2012-2018).
Figure 4. Cumulative proportion of the swept area, landings and value. Grid cells were sorted from highest to lowest fishing intensity and include non-fished cells. The results are for all mobile bottom-contacting gears based on averaged fishing data per c-square from 2013-2018.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Figure 5. Number of years c-squares are within the 90% core fishing grounds by metier during the period 2013-2018
Figure 6. Percentage area overlap between the 90% highest value per year and the reference core fishing ground
Figure 7. Percent area fished vs. landings value (euro) by métier, coloured by year
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
| DRB_MOL | OT_CRU | OT_DMF | OT_MI | OT_SPF | SDN_DMF | SSC_DMF | TBB_CRU | TBB_DMF | TBB_MOL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area swept (1000 km2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | <0.005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Landings (1000 tonnes) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Value (10^6 euro) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | <0.005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/Area swept (1000 km2) | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | 11.38 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Value (10^6 euro)/Area swept (1000 km2) | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | 2.28 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
Figure 8. Impact of mobile bottom-contacting gears averaged for the 2013-2018 six-year cycle for the PD and L1 method.
Figure 9. The mean impact of mobile bottom-contacting gears in all combined MSFD habitats and the four most extensive habitat types between 2009 and 2018 (left). The proportion of the fished area with an impact of less than 0.2 (right)
| DRB_MOL | OT_CRU | OT_DMF | OT_MI | OT_SPF | SDN_DMF | SSC_DMF | TBB_CRU | TBB_DMF | TBB_MOL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/PD impact | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2.080 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Value (10^6 euro)/PD impact | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.417 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/L1 impact | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1.771 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Value (10^6 euro)/L1 impact | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.355 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Figure 10. PD impact (upper panel) and L1 impact (lower panel) of selected gear groupings on the most extensive MSFD habitat types. Impact is estimated in isolation of the other gear groupings. Note the different scales on the Y-axis.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 98.25 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 98.80 | 93.86 | 93.69 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 99.17 | 90.22 | 90.22 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 99.17 | 90.22 | 90.22 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 99.53 | 86.88 | 87.04 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 71.30 | 70.65 |
| 40 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 71.30 | 70.65 |
| 60 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 71.30 | 70.65 |
| 80 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 71.30 | 70.65 |
| 99 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 71.30 | 70.65 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.07 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 99.18 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 99.25 | 94.55 | 94.80 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 99.25 | 94.55 | 94.80 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 99.27 | 82.86 | 82.50 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 99.43 | 72.13 | 71.87 |
| 40 | 0 | 0 | 99.43 | 72.13 | 71.87 |
| 60 | 0 | 0 | 99.84 | 47.88 | 46.84 |
| 80 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 27.19 | 26.63 |
| 99 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 27.19 | 26.63 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 98.91 | 100.0 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 99.32 | 100.0 | 100.00 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 99.32 | 100.0 | 100.00 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 99.32 | 100.0 | 100.00 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 99.32 | 100.0 | 100.00 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 86.1 | 85.93 |
| 40 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 86.1 | 85.93 |
| 60 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 86.1 | 85.93 |
| 80 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 86.1 | 85.93 |
| 99 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 86.1 | 85.93 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.93 | 100 | 100 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 40 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 60 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 80 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 99 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circalittoral mud | 3.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 5.99 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.69 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 6.29 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 0.93 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 1.26 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Circalittoral sand | 2.06 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 0.26 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.1 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 0.61 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral sand | 0.73 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.13 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.88 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 3.06 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.9 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.06 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.36 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Unknown | 0.17 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circalittoral mud | 3.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 5.99 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.69 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 6.29 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 0.93 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 1.26 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Circalittoral sand | 2.06 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 0.26 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.1 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 0.61 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral sand | 0.73 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.13 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.88 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 3.06 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.9 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.06 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.36 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Unknown | 0.17 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circalittoral mud | 3.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 5.99 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.69 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 6.29 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 0.93 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 1.26 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Circalittoral sand | 2.06 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 0.26 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.1 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 0.61 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral sand | 0.73 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.13 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.88 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 3.06 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.9 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.06 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.36 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Unknown | 0.17 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
| Indicators | 0 to 200 m | 200 to 800 m | more than 800 m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average intensity (I-1) | 0 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area in fished cells (I-2) | 0 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area fished per year (I-3) | 0 | NA | NA |
| Smallest prop. of area in fished cells with 90% of fishing effort (I-4) | 0 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area in unfished cells (I-5) | 1 | NA | NA |
| Average PD impact (I-6) | 0 | NA | NA |
| Average L1 impact (I-6) | 0 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area with PD impact < 0.2 (I-7) | 1 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area with L1 impact < 0.2 (I-7) | 1 | NA | NA |
Figure 1 Geographic distribution of surface abrasion, seabed sensitivity (community longevity) and total value and weight from mobile bottom-contacting gear. The maps of surface abrasion, value and weight show the average per year for 2013-2018
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
Figure 2 Surface abrasion, Swept Area Ratio, by mobile bottom-contacting gears (year-1), averaged for the 2013-2018 six-year cycle
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat (1000 km2) | Number of grid cells | Landings 1000 tonnes | Value 106 euro | Swept area 1000 km2 | Average intensity (I-1) | Prop. of area in fished grid cells (I-2) | Prop. of area fished per year (I-3) | Smallest prop. of area with 90% of fishing effort (I-4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 5.45 | 542 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 1.43 | 217 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 0.84 | 120 | 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 0 | 0.02 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.48 | 111 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Circalittoral mud | 5.16 | 506 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 1.99 | 294 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.05 | 32 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Circalittoral sand | 1.30 | 279 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 0.53 | 136 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.01 | 7 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.05 | 16 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Infralittoral sand | 0.70 | 142 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.00 | 1 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 0.01 | 2 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
Figure 3. Time series of (a) mean fishing intensity (surface abrasion), (b) proportion of the surface area of the seafloor fished, (c) aggregation of fishing (proportion of the surface area with 90% of the fishing effort) by habitat. Results represent vessels over 15m (2009-2011) and vessels over 12m (2012-2018).
Figure 4. Cumulative proportion of the swept area, landings and value. Grid cells were sorted from highest to lowest fishing intensity and include non-fished cells. The results are for all mobile bottom-contacting gears based on averaged fishing data per c-square from 2013-2018.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Figure 5. Number of years c-squares are within the 90% core fishing grounds by metier during the period 2013-2018
Figure 6. Percentage area overlap between the 90% highest value per year and the reference core fishing ground
Figure 7. Percent area fished vs. landings value (euro) by métier, coloured by year
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
| DRB_MOL | OT_CRU | OT_DMF | OT_MI | OT_SPF | SDN_DMF | SSC_DMF | TBB_CRU | TBB_DMF | TBB_MOL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area swept (1000 km2) | <0.005 | 0 | <0.005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Landings (1000 tonnes) | 0.05 | 0 | <0.005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Value (10^6 euro) | <0.005 | 0 | <0.005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/Area swept (1000 km2) | 2142.54 | NaN | 0.01 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Value (10^6 euro)/Area swept (1000 km2) | 85.7 | NaN | <0.005 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
Figure 8. Impact of mobile bottom-contacting gears averaged for the 2013-2018 six-year cycle for the PD and L1 method.
Figure 9. The mean impact of mobile bottom-contacting gears in all combined MSFD habitats and the four most extensive habitat types between 2009 and 2018 (left). The proportion of the fished area with an impact of less than 0.2 (right)
| DRB_MOL | OT_CRU | OT_DMF | OT_MI | OT_SPF | SDN_DMF | SSC_DMF | TBB_CRU | TBB_DMF | TBB_MOL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/PD impact | 34.438 | NA | 0.003 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Value (10^6 euro)/PD impact | 1.378 | NA | 0.001 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/L1 impact | 39.745 | NA | 0.002 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Value (10^6 euro)/L1 impact | 1.590 | NA | 0.001 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Figure 10. PD impact (upper panel) and L1 impact (lower panel) of selected gear groupings on the most extensive MSFD habitat types. Impact is estimated in isolation of the other gear groupings. Note the different scales on the Y-axis.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.85 | 100 | 100 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 40 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 60 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 80 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 99 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.43 | 100 | 100 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 40 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 60 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 80 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
| 99 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100 | 100 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 96.15 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 98.07 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 98.07 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 98.07 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 98.07 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 98.07 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 40 | 0 | 0 | 98.07 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 60 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 49.64 | 49.64 |
| 80 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 49.64 | 49.64 |
| 99 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 49.64 | 49.64 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | NA | NA |
| 5 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 10 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 15 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 20 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 30 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 40 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 60 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 80 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 99 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 5.45 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 1.43 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 0.84 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.48 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Circalittoral mud | 5.16 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 1.99 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.05 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Circalittoral sand | 1.3 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 0.53 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.01 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.05 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral sand | 0.7 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 0.01 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 5.45 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 1.43 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 0.84 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.48 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Circalittoral mud | 5.16 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 1.99 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.05 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Circalittoral sand | 1.3 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 0.53 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.01 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.05 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral sand | 0.7 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 0.01 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 5.45 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 1.43 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 0.84 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.48 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Circalittoral mud | 5.16 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 1.99 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.05 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Circalittoral sand | 1.3 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 0.53 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.01 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.05 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral sand | 0.7 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 0.01 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
| Indicators | 0 to 200 m | 200 to 800 m | more than 800 m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average intensity (I-1) | 0.26 | 0 | NA |
| Proportion of area in fished cells (I-2) | 0.26 | 0 | NA |
| Proportion of area fished per year (I-3) | 0.10 | 0 | NA |
| Smallest prop. of area in fished cells with 90% of fishing effort (I-4) | 0.07 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area in unfished cells (I-5) | 0.74 | 1 | NA |
| Average PD impact (I-6) | 0.00 | 0 | NA |
| Average L1 impact (I-6) | 0.09 | 0 | NA |
| Proportion of area with PD impact < 0.2 (I-7) | 1.00 | 1 | NA |
| Proportion of area with L1 impact < 0.2 (I-7) | 0.88 | 1 | NA |
Figure 1 Geographic distribution of surface abrasion, seabed sensitivity (community longevity) and total value and weight from mobile bottom-contacting gear. The maps of surface abrasion, value and weight show the average per year for 2013-2018
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
Figure 2 Surface abrasion, Swept Area Ratio, by mobile bottom-contacting gears (year-1), averaged for the 2013-2018 six-year cycle
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat (1000 km2) | Number of grid cells | Landings 1000 tonnes | Value 106 euro | Swept area 1000 km2 | Average intensity (I-1) | Prop. of area in fished grid cells (I-2) | Prop. of area fished per year (I-3) | Smallest prop. of area with 90% of fishing effort (I-4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 15.31 | 2121 | 3.93 | 4.02 | 12.17 | 0.79 | 0.33 | 0.21 | 0.08 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 8.43 | 1278 | 2.76 | 2.95 | 8.59 | 1.02 | 0.40 | 0.30 | 0.11 |
| Circalittoral sand | 11.76 | 1880 | 2.09 | 1.24 | 4.14 | 0.35 | 0.49 | 0.17 | 0.08 |
| Circalittoral mud | 7.50 | 1621 | 1.82 | 1.37 | 3.68 | 0.49 | 0.34 | 0.20 | 0.06 |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 16.26 | 2086 | 1.56 | 0.58 | 2.83 | 0.17 | 0.32 | 0.13 | 0.07 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 31.52 | 2735 | 0.95 | 0.75 | 2.01 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.70 | 196 | 0.43 | 0.49 | 1.39 | 1.98 | 0.61 | 0.41 | 0.16 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 28.96 | 3585 | 2.32 | 0.66 | 1.11 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 5.86 | 1391 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| Infralittoral sand | 2.28 | 729 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 3.73 | 1068 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 2.21 | 756 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 1.95 | 269 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 5.42 | 1213 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.17 | 278 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 1.36 | 617 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.56 | 416 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.12 | 156 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
Figure 3. Time series of (a) mean fishing intensity (surface abrasion), (b) proportion of the surface area of the seafloor fished, (c) aggregation of fishing (proportion of the surface area with 90% of the fishing effort) by habitat. Results represent vessels over 15m (2009-2011) and vessels over 12m (2012-2018).
Figure 4. Cumulative proportion of the swept area, landings and value. Grid cells were sorted from highest to lowest fishing intensity and include non-fished cells. The results are for all mobile bottom-contacting gears based on averaged fishing data per c-square from 2013-2018.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Figure 5. Number of years c-squares are within the 90% core fishing grounds by metier during the period 2013-2018
Figure 6. Percentage area overlap between the 90% highest value per year and the reference core fishing ground
Figure 7. Percent area fished vs. landings value (euro) by métier, coloured by year
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
| DRB_MOL | OT_CRU | OT_DMF | OT_MI | OT_SPF | SDN_DMF | SSC_DMF | TBB_CRU | TBB_DMF | TBB_MOL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area swept (1000 km2) | 0 | <0.005 | 35.17 | 0 | 1.14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Landings (1000 tonnes) | 0 | 0.01 | 11.78 | 0 | 4.44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Value (10^6 euro) | 0 | <0.005 | 11.21 | 0 | 0.98 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/Area swept (1000 km2) | NaN | 6.94 | 0.33 | NaN | 3.91 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Value (10^6 euro)/Area swept (1000 km2) | NaN | 2.06 | 0.32 | NaN | 0.86 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
Figure 8. Impact of mobile bottom-contacting gears averaged for the 2013-2018 six-year cycle for the PD and L1 method.
Figure 9. The mean impact of mobile bottom-contacting gears in all combined MSFD habitats and the four most extensive habitat types between 2009 and 2018 (left). The proportion of the fished area with an impact of less than 0.2 (right)
| DRB_MOL | OT_CRU | OT_DMF | OT_MI | OT_SPF | SDN_DMF | SSC_DMF | TBB_CRU | TBB_DMF | TBB_MOL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/PD impact | NA | 1.223 | 0.319 | NA | 4.730 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Value (10^6 euro)/PD impact | NA | 0.363 | 0.303 | NA | 1.043 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/L1 impact | NA | 1.806 | 0.017 | NA | 0.082 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Value (10^6 euro)/L1 impact | NA | 0.536 | 0.016 | NA | 0.018 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Figure 10. PD impact (upper panel) and L1 impact (lower panel) of selected gear groupings on the most extensive MSFD habitat types. Impact is estimated in isolation of the other gear groupings. Note the different scales on the Y-axis.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.01 | 0.20 | 66.75 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 81.66 | 94.47 | 91.82 |
| 10 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 84.24 | 89.20 | 86.57 |
| 15 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 85.94 | 84.49 | 81.80 |
| 20 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 87.72 | 79.09 | 76.53 |
| 30 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 90.16 | 68.76 | 66.42 |
| 40 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 92.33 | 59.23 | 57.08 |
| 60 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 95.57 | 39.19 | 37.99 |
| 80 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 98.15 | 19.41 | 18.88 |
| 99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 1.38 | 1.28 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 60.27 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0.02 | 0.23 | 72.93 | 93.89 | 92.10 |
| 10 | 0.02 | 0.20 | 77.97 | 88.64 | 86.83 |
| 15 | 0.02 | 0.18 | 81.36 | 83.07 | 81.24 |
| 20 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 83.93 | 77.94 | 76.17 |
| 30 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 87.67 | 67.08 | 65.92 |
| 40 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 90.52 | 56.50 | 55.66 |
| 60 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 94.70 | 36.94 | 36.62 |
| 80 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 97.85 | 19.46 | 19.14 |
| 99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 2.12 | 1.99 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.01 | 0.17 | 50.99 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 77.34 | 95.77 | 94.29 |
| 10 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 82.40 | 91.55 | 89.23 |
| 15 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 85.91 | 86.89 | 83.22 |
| 20 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 88.52 | 82.27 | 76.58 |
| 30 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 92.21 | 71.29 | 61.60 |
| 40 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 94.85 | 62.27 | 48.77 |
| 60 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 97.98 | 45.52 | 27.96 |
| 80 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 99.41 | 26.18 | 15.82 |
| 99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 8.80 | 5.42 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.01 | 0.19 | 66.39 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 80.95 | 93.43 | 86.99 |
| 10 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 83.19 | 88.06 | 79.52 |
| 15 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 85.70 | 82.88 | 72.30 |
| 20 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 87.16 | 78.52 | 69.09 |
| 30 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 90.37 | 68.44 | 61.16 |
| 40 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 92.45 | 58.59 | 46.59 |
| 60 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 95.95 | 37.70 | 28.25 |
| 80 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 98.38 | 20.27 | 15.73 |
| 99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 4.53 | 3.67 |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 15.31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 3.0 | 29.8 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 8.43 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 12.7 | 38.7 |
| Circalittoral sand | 11.76 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 7.4 | 24.0 |
| Circalittoral mud | 7.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 3.9 | 29.8 |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 16.26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 1.9 | 22.4 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 31.52 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 2.9 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 16.2 | 45.9 | 74.4 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 28.96 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.9 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 5.86 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 6.8 |
| Infralittoral sand | 2.28 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 10.4 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 3.73 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 2.21 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 1.95 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 5.42 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.17 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 1.36 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.56 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 24.1 |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.12 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 15.31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 3.5 | 31.2 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 8.43 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.9 | 14.5 | 42.6 |
| Circalittoral sand | 11.76 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 6.7 | 21.8 |
| Circalittoral mud | 7.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 0.3 | 5.6 | 31.6 |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 16.26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 4.9 | 31.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 31.52 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 0.3 | 7.4 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 16.7 | 46.1 | 73.1 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 28.96 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.2 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 5.86 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 1.1 | 9.2 |
| Infralittoral sand | 2.28 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 16.5 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 3.73 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 2.21 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 1.95 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 5.42 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.17 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 1.36 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.56 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 52.8 |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.12 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 15.31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 6.2 | 33.6 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 8.43 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.8 | 16.4 | 43.4 |
| Circalittoral sand | 11.76 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 8.5 | 29.1 |
| Circalittoral mud | 7.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 0.7 | 12.0 | 38.8 |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 16.26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 7.3 | 33.3 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 31.52 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 28.1 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 18.1 | 47.3 | 74.1 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 28.96 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.1 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 5.86 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 1.1 | 8.1 |
| Infralittoral sand | 2.28 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 26.3 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 3.73 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 2.21 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 1.95 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 5.42 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.17 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 1.36 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.56 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 55.1 |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.12 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
| Indicators | 0 to 200 m | 200 to 800 m | more than 800 m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average intensity (I-1) | 1.10 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area in fished cells (I-2) | 0.78 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area fished per year (I-3) | 0.42 | NA | NA |
| Smallest prop. of area in fished cells with 90% of fishing effort (I-4) | 0.31 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area in unfished cells (I-5) | 0.22 | NA | NA |
| Average PD impact (I-6) | 0.02 | NA | NA |
| Average L1 impact (I-6) | 0.41 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area with PD impact < 0.2 (I-7) | 0.99 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area with L1 impact < 0.2 (I-7) | 0.46 | NA | NA |
Figure 1 Geographic distribution of surface abrasion, seabed sensitivity (community longevity) and total value and weight from mobile bottom-contacting gear. The maps of surface abrasion, value and weight show the average per year for 2013-2018
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
Figure 2 Surface abrasion, Swept Area Ratio, by mobile bottom-contacting gears (year-1), averaged for the 2013-2018 six-year cycle
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat (1000 km2) | Number of grid cells | Landings 1000 tonnes | Value 106 euro | Swept area 1000 km2 | Average intensity (I-1) | Prop. of area in fished grid cells (I-2) | Prop. of area fished per year (I-3) | Smallest prop. of area with 90% of fishing effort (I-4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 9.44 | 810 | 11.87 | 8.83 | 25.07 | 2.66 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.49 |
| Circalittoral sand | 8.57 | 1242 | 2.91 | 2.48 | 8.83 | 1.03 | 0.90 | 0.47 | 0.23 |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 3.20 | 484 | 3.44 | 2.87 | 8.82 | 2.75 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.28 |
| Infralittoral sand | 11.86 | 1190 | 1.98 | 1.41 | 6.72 | 0.57 | 0.74 | 0.30 | 0.19 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 10.03 | 1143 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 4.24 | 0.42 | 0.59 | 0.22 | 0.18 |
| Circalittoral mud | 1.99 | 479 | 1.46 | 1.23 | 3.27 | 1.64 | 0.98 | 0.67 | 0.32 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 1.47 | 314 | 1.31 | 1.01 | 3.22 | 2.20 | 0.98 | 0.71 | 0.38 |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 1.23 | 189 | 0.65 | 0.38 | 1.03 | 0.84 | 0.92 | 0.50 | 0.33 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 1.38 | 167 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.75 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.26 | 0.36 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 2.69 | 627 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.09 | 0.46 | 0.07 | 0.12 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 1.30 | 519 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.60 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 2.95 | 621 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.42 | 0.06 | 0.12 |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.24 | 93 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.40 | 0.17 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.49 | 147 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.58 | 0.07 | 0.09 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.05 | 66 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.42 | 0.84 | 0.37 | 0.08 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.02 | 30 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.58 | 0.97 | 0.41 | 0.30 |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.00 | 3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 1.00 | 0.22 | NA |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 0.00 | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA |
Figure 3. Time series of (a) mean fishing intensity (surface abrasion), (b) proportion of the surface area of the seafloor fished, (c) aggregation of fishing (proportion of the surface area with 90% of the fishing effort) by habitat. Results represent vessels over 15m (2009-2011) and vessels over 12m (2012-2018).
Figure 4. Cumulative proportion of the swept area, landings and value. Grid cells were sorted from highest to lowest fishing intensity and include non-fished cells. The results are for all mobile bottom-contacting gears based on averaged fishing data per c-square from 2013-2018.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Figure 5. Number of years c-squares are within the 90% core fishing grounds by metier during the period 2013-2018
Figure 6. Percentage area overlap between the 90% highest value per year and the reference core fishing ground
Figure 7. Percent area fished vs. landings value (euro) by métier, coloured by year
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
| DRB_MOL | OT_CRU | OT_DMF | OT_MI | OT_SPF | SDN_DMF | SSC_DMF | TBB_CRU | TBB_DMF | TBB_MOL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area swept (1000 km2) | 0 | <0.005 | 59.14 | 0 | 1.40 | 2.26 | 0.02 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Landings (1000 tonnes) | 0 | <0.005 | 24.07 | 0 | 2.60 | 0.14 | <0.005 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Value (10^6 euro) | 0 | <0.005 | 19.09 | 0 | 0.92 | 0.21 | <0.005 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/Area swept (1000 km2) | NaN | 0.79 | 0.41 | NaN | 1.86 | 0.06 | 0.05 | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Value (10^6 euro)/Area swept (1000 km2) | NaN | 0.78 | 0.32 | NaN | 0.66 | 0.09 | 0.08 | NaN | NaN | NaN |
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
Figure 8. Impact of mobile bottom-contacting gears averaged for the 2013-2018 six-year cycle for the PD and L1 method.
Figure 9. The mean impact of mobile bottom-contacting gears in all combined MSFD habitats and the four most extensive habitat types between 2009 and 2018 (left). The proportion of the fished area with an impact of less than 0.2 (right)
| DRB_MOL | OT_CRU | OT_DMF | OT_MI | OT_SPF | SDN_DMF | SSC_DMF | TBB_CRU | TBB_DMF | TBB_MOL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/PD impact | NA | 0.125 | 0.355 | NA | 2.702 | 0.125 | 0.053 | NA | NA | NA |
| Value (10^6 euro)/PD impact | NA | 0.123 | 0.281 | NA | 0.956 | 0.179 | 0.082 | NA | NA | NA |
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/L1 impact | NA | 0.158 | 0.019 | NA | 0.033 | 0.003 | 0.001 | NA | NA | NA |
| Value (10^6 euro)/L1 impact | NA | 0.155 | 0.015 | NA | 0.012 | 0.005 | 0.001 | NA | NA | NA |
Figure 10. PD impact (upper panel) and L1 impact (lower panel) of selected gear groupings on the most extensive MSFD habitat types. Impact is estimated in isolation of the other gear groupings. Note the different scales on the Y-axis.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.05 | 0.79 | 0.02 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0.05 | 0.68 | 23.85 | 94.68 | 94.69 |
| 10 | 0.05 | 0.59 | 35.56 | 88.68 | 89.06 |
| 15 | 0.04 | 0.51 | 45.16 | 82.67 | 83.97 |
| 20 | 0.04 | 0.45 | 52.00 | 76.70 | 78.61 |
| 30 | 0.04 | 0.35 | 62.95 | 65.55 | 68.52 |
| 40 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 71.32 | 55.73 | 59.37 |
| 60 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 83.66 | 37.12 | 39.40 |
| 80 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 93.37 | 18.47 | 18.70 |
| 99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 0.91 | 0.77 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.02 | 0.49 | 10.16 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0.02 | 0.43 | 48.23 | 94.19 | 93.87 |
| 10 | 0.02 | 0.37 | 58.04 | 89.06 | 88.90 |
| 15 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 64.82 | 83.75 | 83.79 |
| 20 | 0.02 | 0.28 | 69.80 | 77.70 | 78.39 |
| 30 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 77.59 | 67.34 | 68.14 |
| 40 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 83.57 | 54.92 | 56.87 |
| 60 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 90.36 | 35.89 | 36.94 |
| 80 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 96.05 | 17.04 | 17.21 |
| 99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 1.12 | 0.71 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.05 | 0.62 | 0.25 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0.05 | 0.49 | 42.94 | 94.86 | 94.49 |
| 10 | 0.05 | 0.39 | 57.59 | 90.32 | 89.98 |
| 15 | 0.04 | 0.32 | 65.85 | 86.01 | 85.37 |
| 20 | 0.04 | 0.27 | 71.71 | 81.34 | 80.07 |
| 30 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 80.81 | 71.86 | 69.91 |
| 40 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 86.97 | 62.87 | 59.42 |
| 60 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 94.10 | 44.62 | 40.29 |
| 80 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 97.79 | 22.53 | 20.65 |
| 99 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 100.00 | 4.59 | 4.29 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.01 | 0.29 | 25.90 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 61.00 | 87.30 | 86.81 |
| 10 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 69.99 | 80.10 | 80.49 |
| 15 | 0.01 | 0.19 | 76.53 | 72.95 | 73.58 |
| 20 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 81.08 | 66.89 | 68.61 |
| 30 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 86.25 | 53.86 | 53.08 |
| 40 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 90.04 | 43.37 | 42.05 |
| 60 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 95.19 | 25.40 | 24.39 |
| 80 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 98.32 | 12.04 | 12.72 |
| 99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 2.05 | 2.99 |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 9.44 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 3.5 | 7.8 | 12.3 | 18.6 | 27.3 | 38.4 | 53.4 | 73.1 |
| Circalittoral sand | 8.57 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 5.8 | 11.3 | 20.5 | 33.7 | 58.5 |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 3.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 4.4 | 7.1 | 11.0 | 19.0 | 28.6 | 46.6 |
| Infralittoral sand | 11.86 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 4.6 | 10.1 | 18.9 | 40.2 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 10.03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 5.0 | 14.6 | 32.4 |
| Circalittoral mud | 1.99 | <0.1 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 5.0 | 10.4 | 16.2 | 23.8 | 34.8 | 48.5 | 68.8 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 1.47 | <0.1 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 8.0 | 18.0 | 27.1 | 40.5 | 56.7 | 78.4 |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 1.23 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 5.5 | 11.8 | 18.4 | 27.9 | 41.4 | 61.1 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 1.38 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 2.9 | 4.8 | 8.1 | 11.5 | 16.4 | 22.0 | 31.9 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 2.69 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 5.3 | 19.2 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 3.7 | 8.6 | 22.0 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 2.95 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 6.6 | 23.8 |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.24 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 1.1 | 4.1 | 11.5 | 18.2 | 51.3 | 79.0 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.49 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 2.7 | 4.4 | 7.1 | 13.9 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.05 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 19.6 | 33.3 | 62.0 | 62.0 | 100.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.02 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 4.7 | 13.9 | 25.1 | 31.6 | 70.7 | 100.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0 | 0.2 | 11.7 | 11.7 | 11.7 | 11.7 | 11.7 | 11.7 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 9.44 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 3.7 | 8.7 | 14.3 | 21.6 | 31.8 | 42.8 | 56.6 | 75.2 |
| Circalittoral sand | 8.57 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 3.4 | 6.7 | 12.3 | 22.9 | 36.5 | 63.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 3.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 2.9 | 4.6 | 7.1 | 10.5 | 17.9 | 26.9 | 43.2 |
| Infralittoral sand | 11.86 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 5.2 | 12.2 | 20.1 | 31.5 | 57.1 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 10.03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 5.5 | 17.0 | 37.9 |
| Circalittoral mud | 1.99 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 3.2 | 6.2 | 12.3 | 19.0 | 27.6 | 38.4 | 55.9 | 74.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 1.47 | <0.1 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 4.5 | 9.8 | 20.6 | 29.6 | 42.7 | 58.1 | 78.3 |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 1.23 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 7.7 | 14.9 | 20.3 | 33.0 | 50.4 | 69.4 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 1.38 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 5.3 | 8.9 | 12.7 | 18.0 | 24.2 | 34.4 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 2.69 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 8.1 | 24.5 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 3.1 | 5.3 | 12.0 | 28.6 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 2.95 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 5.6 | 21.6 |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.24 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 4.5 | 13.6 | 25.8 | 38.1 | 70.1 | 89.9 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.49 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.9 | 4.4 | 9.9 | 18.1 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.05 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 24.9 | 36.0 | 67.4 | 67.4 | 100.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.02 | <0.1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 4.8 | 13.0 | 25.2 | 34.3 | 72.6 | 100.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0 | 0.0 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 9.44 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 3.8 | 8.5 | 13.4 | 19.9 | 28.9 | 39.1 | 53.3 | 74.2 |
| Circalittoral sand | 8.57 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 3.8 | 7.0 | 12.4 | 22.1 | 35.6 | 61.9 |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 3.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 3.3 | 4.9 | 7.5 | 10.9 | 19.0 | 28.9 | 47.9 |
| Infralittoral sand | 11.86 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 5.9 | 12.8 | 19.7 | 30.1 | 58.3 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 10.03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 5.1 | 17.1 | 40.3 |
| Circalittoral mud | 1.99 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 4.6 | 8.7 | 15.4 | 21.1 | 28.5 | 37.5 | 53.0 | 70.2 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 1.47 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 3.9 | 8.4 | 17.9 | 26.1 | 38.4 | 54.3 | 75.2 |
| Circalittoral mud or Circalittoral sand | 1.23 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.9 | 2.7 | 9.0 | 16.4 | 19.8 | 34.0 | 54.2 | 73.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud or Offshore circalittoral sand | 1.38 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 2.9 | 4.2 | 6.2 | 10.1 | 14.3 | 19.6 | 25.8 | 35.1 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 2.69 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 6.0 | 18.0 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 5.8 | 12.3 | 26.2 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 2.95 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 3.6 | 15.5 |
| Infralittoral mud | 0.24 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 7.5 | 20.6 | 34.7 | 45.4 | 76.3 | 90.8 |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.49 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.7 | 3.9 | 8.5 | 19.3 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.05 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 17.6 | 32.3 | 66.8 | 66.8 | 100.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.02 | <0.1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 4.6 | 12.9 | 24.0 | 31.4 | 74.5 | 100.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0 | <0.1 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Infralittoral mud or Infralittoral sand | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
| Indicators | 0 to 200 m | 200 to 800 m | more than 800 m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average intensity (I-1) | 0.72 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area in fished cells (I-2) | 0.57 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area fished per year (I-3) | 0.27 | NA | NA |
| Smallest prop. of area in fished cells with 90% of fishing effort (I-4) | 0.20 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area in unfished cells (I-5) | 0.43 | NA | NA |
| Average PD impact (I-6) | 0.02 | NA | NA |
| Average L1 impact (I-6) | 0.29 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area with PD impact < 0.2 (I-7) | 0.99 | NA | NA |
| Proportion of area with L1 impact < 0.2 (I-7) | 0.63 | NA | NA |
Figure 1 Geographic distribution of surface abrasion, seabed sensitivity (community longevity) and total value and weight from mobile bottom-contacting gear. The maps of surface abrasion, value and weight show the average per year for 2013-2018
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
Figure 2 Surface abrasion, Swept Area Ratio, by mobile bottom-contacting gears (year-1), averaged for the 2013-2018 six-year cycle
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat (1000 km2) | Number of grid cells | Landings 1000 tonnes | Value 106 euro | Swept area 1000 km2 | Average intensity (I-1) | Prop. of area in fished grid cells (I-2) | Prop. of area fished per year (I-3) | Smallest prop. of area with 90% of fishing effort (I-4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infralittoral sand | 7.70 | 990 | 1.28 | 1.56 | 4.14 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.20 | 0.13 |
| Circalittoral mud | 1.84 | 310 | 1.82 | 2.09 | 3.85 | 2.09 | 0.90 | 0.72 | 0.25 |
| Circalittoral sand | 2.03 | 550 | 1.26 | 1.50 | 2.99 | 1.47 | 0.74 | 0.48 | 0.17 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 0.22 | 70 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.63 | 2.83 | 0.93 | 0.85 | 0.19 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 3.18 | 669 | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 0.45 | 0.10 | 0.12 |
| Infralittoral mud | 1.22 | 361 | 0.27 | 0.33 | 0.52 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.18 | 0.12 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.45 | 304 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.35 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.35 | 0.16 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.21 | 144 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.28 | 1.33 | 0.83 | 0.49 | 0.24 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 0.74 | 240 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.26 | 0.36 | 0.68 | 0.20 | 0.22 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.07 | 94 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 1.63 | 0.76 | 0.61 | 0.24 |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.05 | 80 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.24 | 0.16 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.01 | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.52 | 0.22 | NA |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.00 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.05 | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.00 | 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA |
Figure 3. Time series of (a) mean fishing intensity (surface abrasion), (b) proportion of the surface area of the seafloor fished, (c) aggregation of fishing (proportion of the surface area with 90% of the fishing effort) by habitat. Results represent vessels over 15m (2009-2011) and vessels over 12m (2012-2018).
Figure 4. Cumulative proportion of the swept area, landings and value. Grid cells were sorted from highest to lowest fishing intensity and include non-fished cells. The results are for all mobile bottom-contacting gears based on averaged fishing data per c-square from 2013-2018.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Figure 5. Number of years c-squares are within the 90% core fishing grounds by metier during the period 2013-2018
Figure 6. Percentage area overlap between the 90% highest value per year and the reference core fishing ground
Figure 7. Percent area fished vs. landings value (euro) by métier, coloured by year
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
| DRB_MOL | OT_CRU | OT_DMF | OT_MI | OT_SPF | SDN_DMF | SSC_DMF | TBB_CRU | TBB_DMF | TBB_MOL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area swept (1000 km2) | 0 | <0.005 | 10.97 | 0 | 0.06 | 2.82 | <0.005 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Landings (1000 tonnes) | 0 | <0.005 | 4.97 | 0 | 0.26 | 0.25 | <0.005 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Value (10^6 euro) | 0 | <0.005 | 6.13 | 0 | 0.08 | 0.36 | <0.005 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/Area swept (1000 km2) | NaN | 0.3 | 0.45 | NaN | 4.31 | 0.09 | 0.03 | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Value (10^6 euro)/Area swept (1000 km2) | NaN | 1.22 | 0.56 | NaN | 1.35 | 0.13 | 0.05 | NaN | NaN | NaN |
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Mauris varius lorem consectetur, volutpat urna in, volutpat massa. Nam congue, mauris nec ullamcorper congue, quam dui condimentum sem, mattis egestas est orci in massa. Duis faucibus egestas erat eu placerat. Praesent eleifend euismod rutrum. Morbi eget laoreet justo, vitae finibus justo. In vitae lacus a turpis pretium facilisis et et magna. Duis pretium diam finibus est consectetur, ut posuere risus faucibus. Donec mi orci, pellentesque ac dui id, vulputate volutpat leo. Proin quis gravida nulla. Vestibulum lobortis sit amet neque nec pulvinar. Phasellus id tortor congue, aliquet nulla at, venenatis turpis. Cras semper diam vitae gravida ultricies. Donec eu ultricies diam. Aliquam mattis interdum maximus. Proin sed lacus nibh.
Figure 8. Impact of mobile bottom-contacting gears averaged for the 2013-2018 six-year cycle for the PD and L1 method.
Figure 9. The mean impact of mobile bottom-contacting gears in all combined MSFD habitats and the four most extensive habitat types between 2009 and 2018 (left). The proportion of the fished area with an impact of less than 0.2 (right)
| DRB_MOL | OT_CRU | OT_DMF | OT_MI | OT_SPF | SDN_DMF | SSC_DMF | TBB_CRU | TBB_DMF | TBB_MOL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/PD impact | NA | 0.018 | 0.290 | NA | 2.272 | 0.171 | 0.019 | NA | NA | NA |
| Value (10^6 euro)/PD impact | NA | 0.072 | 0.358 | NA | 0.710 | 0.244 | 0.033 | NA | NA | NA |
| Landings (1000 tonnes)/L1 impact | NA | 0.018 | 0.018 | NA | 0.051 | 0.006 | 0.000 | NA | NA | NA |
| Value (10^6 euro)/L1 impact | NA | 0.074 | 0.022 | NA | 0.016 | 0.009 | 0.001 | NA | NA | NA |
Figure 10. PD impact (upper panel) and L1 impact (lower panel) of selected gear groupings on the most extensive MSFD habitat types. Impact is estimated in isolation of the other gear groupings. Note the different scales on the Y-axis.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vehicula scelerisque ligula et eleifend. Nulla lacus velit, tristique a nunc vel, scelerisque porttitor mauris. Vivamus ligula arcu, posuere imperdiet auctor ut, rutrum non tortor. Phasellus feugiat libero nisi. Suspendisse pretium justo ligula, nec ornare lorem molestie nec. Sed suscipit nisl eu eleifend sollicitudin. Curabitur tincidunt blandit sapien, non fermentum eros pretium a. Pellentesque fringilla ac nisl vel mattis. In at dui eget arcu eleifend convallis. Fusce luctus eros vel sapien condimentum, et lobortis nisl vehicula. Aenean hendrerit egestas odio, vel eleifend ipsum tempor id. Phasellus id magna cursus, ornare arcu finibus, tempus nulla. Aenean eu eros sit amet neque convallis mollis sit amet vitae justo. Donec consectetur in nibh id sagittis.
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 46.97 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 76.37 | 91.26 | 89.95 |
| 10 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 82.48 | 82.78 | 81.84 |
| 15 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 85.95 | 74.45 | 71.94 |
| 20 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 88.49 | 66.21 | 63.63 |
| 30 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 92.06 | 49.34 | 46.67 |
| 40 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 94.63 | 37.20 | 34.30 |
| 60 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 97.32 | 22.01 | 19.04 |
| 80 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 99.53 | 10.15 | 8.12 |
| 99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 5.82 | 4.49 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.05 | 0.74 | 9.92 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0.05 | 0.64 | 34.84 | 94.44 | 93.75 |
| 10 | 0.05 | 0.57 | 42.97 | 89.25 | 88.39 |
| 15 | 0.05 | 0.49 | 51.76 | 83.58 | 82.70 |
| 20 | 0.04 | 0.44 | 56.29 | 77.96 | 76.81 |
| 30 | 0.04 | 0.36 | 64.90 | 66.76 | 65.63 |
| 40 | 0.03 | 0.28 | 72.76 | 56.30 | 55.13 |
| 60 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 85.18 | 36.14 | 35.68 |
| 80 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 94.23 | 18.98 | 19.38 |
| 99 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 100.00 | 3.11 | 3.52 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.04 | 0.49 | 26.41 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0.04 | 0.40 | 55.99 | 94.40 | 93.43 |
| 10 | 0.03 | 0.35 | 62.86 | 88.91 | 86.67 |
| 15 | 0.03 | 0.30 | 68.33 | 83.19 | 80.92 |
| 20 | 0.03 | 0.26 | 72.06 | 78.08 | 75.80 |
| 30 | 0.03 | 0.21 | 78.73 | 68.25 | 65.90 |
| 40 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 84.47 | 59.53 | 56.42 |
| 60 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 92.29 | 41.36 | 37.22 |
| 80 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 97.58 | 19.30 | 17.39 |
| 99 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 100.00 | 5.56 | 3.48 |
Multi-purpose habitat management trade-off for the most extensive MSFD habitat type.
| Effort reduction (%) | Average PD impact | Average L1 impact | Area unfished (%) | Value (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.07 | 0.87 | 6.62 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 0.07 | 0.77 | 23.30 | 93.43 | 92.84 |
| 10 | 0.06 | 0.64 | 36.99 | 88.97 | 88.55 |
| 15 | 0.06 | 0.60 | 41.36 | 84.65 | 84.29 |
| 20 | 0.06 | 0.54 | 51.69 | 78.95 | 78.59 |
| 30 | 0.05 | 0.43 | 60.10 | 68.40 | 68.51 |
| 40 | 0.04 | 0.40 | 64.10 | 60.18 | 60.52 |
| 60 | 0.03 | 0.28 | 79.80 | 43.93 | 44.67 |
| 80 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 93.67 | 25.04 | 25.85 |
| 99 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 100.00 | 14.45 | 14.95 |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infralittoral sand | 7.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 7.7 | 24.4 |
| Circalittoral mud | 1.84 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.6 | 3.5 | 8.9 | 14.0 | 25.6 | 37.6 | 53.3 | 70.6 |
| Circalittoral sand | 2.03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 7.3 | 17.5 | 32.4 | 55.4 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 0.22 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 3.8 | 8.2 | 13.7 | 23.7 | 37.3 | 53.8 | 73.9 | 85.3 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 3.18 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 3.9 | 16.8 |
| Infralittoral mud | 1.22 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.7 | 6.4 | 28.7 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.45 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 5.6 | 15.3 | 26.7 | 63.4 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.21 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.4 | 2.5 | 6.8 | 12.8 | 21.9 | 36.9 | 56.0 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 0.74 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 4.4 | 8.1 | 17.0 | 34.9 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.07 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 4.5 | 9.9 | 17.5 | 29.7 | 46.9 | 76.2 |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.05 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 12.2 | 40.4 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.01 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.6 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.05 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infralittoral sand | 7.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 3.9 | 13.4 | 40.5 |
| Circalittoral mud | 1.84 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.6 | 4.0 | 9.5 | 15.9 | 28.3 | 42.0 | 58.2 | 75.2 |
| Circalittoral sand | 2.03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.4 | 2.5 | 8.6 | 19.7 | 33.6 | 54.9 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 0.22 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 5.6 | 10.0 | 15.4 | 25.8 | 39.8 | 56.1 | 75.0 | 85.5 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 3.18 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 3.9 | 15.6 |
| Infralittoral mud | 1.22 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.6 | 6.0 | 30.8 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.45 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 4.7 | 12.9 | 24.6 | 56.0 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.21 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 6.6 | 12.3 | 22.5 | 37.6 | 55.5 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 0.74 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 6.6 | 12.4 | 29.5 | 55.1 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.07 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 5.0 | 11.7 | 21.1 | 37.9 | 58.6 | 81.4 |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.05 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 10.0 | 37.9 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.01 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.3 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.05 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| MSFD broad habitat type | Extent of habitat 1000 km2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infralittoral sand | 7.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 4.7 | 14.6 | 43.4 |
| Circalittoral mud | 1.84 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 1.1 | 4.6 | 10.5 | 16.8 | 29.8 | 43.3 | 58.9 | 75.3 |
| Circalittoral sand | 2.03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.6 | 3.3 | 10.7 | 21.9 | 36.5 | 59.4 |
| Offshore circalittoral mud | 0.22 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 6.2 | 10.5 | 15.7 | 25.8 | 39.5 | 55.3 | 74.1 | 85.1 |
| Infralittoral mixed sediment | 3.18 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 19.5 |
| Infralittoral mud | 1.22 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.7 | 6.5 | 31.8 |
| Circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.45 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 6.3 | 14.2 | 26.4 | 56.3 |
| Offshore circalittoral sand | 0.21 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.3 | 4.4 | 8.8 | 18.3 | 38.4 | 53.6 | 67.0 |
| Infralittoral coarse sediment | 0.74 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 3.1 | 6.7 | 14.2 | 30.3 | 55.1 |
| Circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.07 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 5.7 | 12.0 | 20.8 | 37.1 | 59.5 | 81.1 |
| Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment | 0.05 | 0.0 | 0.0 | <0.1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 5.0 | 15.8 | 44.4 |
| Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment | 0.01 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.2 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0.05 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |
| Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef | 0 | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN | NaN |